Savage Axis 308 Review the Truth About Guns
We may earn a commission when yous purchase through the links on our site. Find out more hither.
Those of y'all who read my reviews and articles know that I am more often than not a handgun guy. I cut my shooting teeth on that blazon of firearm. I guess growing upwards in a country that did not let “regular†rifle calibers for deer hunting (only pistol calibers were legal) until fairly recently may have had something to do with my bias towards the short arm. Enter some new regulations for deer hunting and the proliferation of coyotes in the fields across the road from our front thou and bingo â€" rifles are cool! I have the required .22, a Ruger 10/22 along with several others. The ane that has taken the most deer is a Fell Centrality Ii XP in .243.
Pros
- Adjustable Accutrigger
- Pillar bedded stock
- Large tang safety
- Detachable box magazine
- Durable and reliable
- Great value
- Proficient action
- Cost-effective
Cons
- Crappy stock
- Plastic clip on magazine
BONUS Offering: Get your free shooting range targets to print at abode!
Get your gratuitous targets to print at home!
Subscribe to our newsletter and become gun deals, educational content, hand'due south on reviews and news on police changes!
A Trivial Backstory
I never really thought about owning such a critter much before a few years ago until the deer laws inverse and the coyotes developed even-more-pushy personalities. And then I thought that it might be expert to take something that could reach out farther than my .44 Magnum S&W could, which this gun does admirably. (I was a deer hunter before but I used that .44 and a Ruger .45 Colt â€" I am in the approximate one% of hunters in my country that take deer with a handgun. The latest bodily statistics are available for 2016, with the percentage of deer kills by a handgun at effectually .five%). Why practise I mention this? I but want to make the signal that I was a dedicated handgun hunter only wanted to aggrandize my universe to include a centerfire rifle that didn’t shoot a pistol cartridge, and I found a cracking.
OK…plenty about that. This review is about the Barbarous Axis IIXP. I think i of the best ways to talk well-nigh one rifle is to compare it with a similar rifle from another manufacturer. I had the opportunity to check out a Mossberg Patriot Predator that belongs to 1 of our sons â€" let'southward look at both guns and so go from there.
The Savage Axis II XP
Cruel is a company that has been around a while. The company was founded in 1894 by Arthur Savage in Utica, New York. Within a few years they were making rifles, handguns and ammunition. They built the first hammerless lever-activity burglarize, the model 1895. A lot of shooters don’t know that Vicious was 1 of the two finalists in the Army’s pistol trials that concluded with the adoption of the Filly Model of 1911 .45 ACP. I discovered that fact when I was researching the quondam warhorse and its cartridge for an before article. You can read about the Colt’s history, and the .45 ACP’s. Needless to say, the Colt won the contract only what is interesting is the fact that the Savage made it to the finals. This, from a company that now is known for its rifles â€" not handguns. The company, after merging with another visitor, produced Lewis machine guns during WWI.
In 1919, this logo made its beginning appearance:
How do nosotros get from a visitor in New York to a logo with the head of this distinguished gentleman? Well, that was the twelvemonth that Primary Lame Deer approached Arthur Brutal about building rifles at a discount for his tribe in New York in commutation for his likeness and a yearly fee. Information technology's interesting to annotation that the fee has been paid yearly, right up through 2018. Now, Barbarous uses a logo that looks like this:
I’ll leave it to y'all, beloved reader, equally to why the company changed its logo.
On with the story â€" in 1920, Savage caused the Stevens Arms company and followed it upwardly nine years after by buying the A.H. Play a trick on Gun Company and moving its product to Utica. Fox was known for its fine shotguns, and Stevens had made pop the rifle-shotgun combination gun. This immune Savage to expand production into these areas, with the model 39 combination rifle-shotgun being introduced in 1939 and a line of inexpensive double-barrel shotguns around that time. WWII saw the visitor making Thompson sub-automobile guns and Lee-Enfield rifles for the British. To hurry this narrative up a piffling, know that the visitor filed for bankruptcy in 1988, but emerged from those ashes very stiff.
The famous AccuTrigger was introduced in 2002, and the visitor was named Manufacturer of the Year in 2003 by the Shooting Industry Academy of Excellence. The residual is fairly axiomatic if walk into a gun shop and see a Vicious rifle for sale – they’re doing pretty well, past all measurements of success. Another indicator is the diverseness of rifles they make â€" a visit to their website yields besides many models to name. They make a lot of rifles.
Comparing 2 Upkeep Rifles
Now, let’s look at specific rifles. Equally far every bit the caliber of my Roughshod rifle, I settled on the .243 Winchester one day when I was in my friend Duane’southward gun shop and saw his brandish of Ruger and Fell bargain rifles. With this caliber, I could hunt deer, coyotes and other small-scale-to-medium size critters. I telephone call them “bargain†guns because they price less than $500, my arbitrary upkeep-price cut-off signal. The Roughshod Axis Ii XP lists for $495 but I paid much less for it at the shop, and it even included a Bushnell Banner 3x9x40 scope. (I know, that’s not a groovy telescopic merely mine works similar a charm).
Beingness the unrepentant reloader that I am, I immediately got a set of dies, some bullets (couldn’t use my dwelling-cast here), and the proper powders. I started putting together some loads using once-fired Winchester manufactory cases. I was rewarded, somewhen, with small groups simply the group that got my attention was one three-shot group that was fired with Winchester mill stuff which measured .41 inch â€" more on shooting this burglarize after. My handloads were not far off that marker.
I after learned that the aged .243 is one of the more accurate burglarize calibers out there, being based on the .308 case and for other reasons. That meant short-action rifles could bedchamber it which opened up a vista of possibilities back in 1955 when information technology was introduced. The thing just took off, being an accurate, versatile caliber with very little recoil. So, I ended up with the Savage in .243.
The Mossberg Patriot Predator
The other upkeep rifle I would similar to utilize for comparison is the Mossberg Patriot Predator. This is a popular gun that sells very well and is in the same price range as my Savage. Son Andy picked upward one of these rifles at the same shop a while afterwards. This rifle was either a trade-in or consignment (probably the latter) that had obviously never been shot. (I think I recall beingness told that it had been won in a raffle by its previous owner).
It was chambered in the mod super-duper caliber, 6.five Creedmoor. This caliber has taken off like a bat out of you lot-know-where. Introduced by Hornady in 2007, this circular (like the .243) was originally based on the .308 case. Developed for long-range target shooting, the 6.5 Creedmoor has earned its share of kudos in that loonshit but nosotros likewise know information technology is popular with hunters. .264-caliber bullets are generally known for their high sectional density and ballistic coefficients. This allows them to exist accurate and effective at long ranges.
Development occurred via a partnership between Hornady Senior Ballistics Scientist Dave Emary and Dennis DeMille, VP of production development for Creedmoor Sports. Now we see where the proper name comes from. At any charge per unit, Andy had for all intents and purposes a new Mossberg in this swell caliber â€" he also has a Savage .308 that he likes just he’ll be carrying the Mossberg in the deer woods this fall.
Now that we’ve had a flake of history most these ii calibers, let’southward look at the rifles. Hither are specifications for each of them â€" we’ll look at these first then get into a bit more than item later.
Why I Like The Savage
I like my Savage. I understand that it is an entry-level burglarize, just also know that, if I wanted a more sophisticated platform, I could stay within the Savage brand and get a real uptown model, with all the bells & whistles. The advantage of existence able to exercise that is that you tin can larn on a “beginner†rifle, switch to a more advanced model and non have to acquire new ways of operating said rifle. The procedures stay pretty much the aforementioned. Now, I get it â€" most manufacturers brand what Sears used to telephone call “good-amend-best" rifles, merely I like the Cruel.
The trigger is an improvement over the older plain-Centrality models and is all I need. (The .41-inch-group I evidence below is proof of that). The safety is in exactly the right spot for this left-hander…right on top of the stock wrist, behind the bolt. That is huge. I was sitting in a deer blind with my son, who had an older forest-stock Fell 110 variation in .308, and watched him as he took his gun off safe to go prepare for a shot. He very slightly moved his hand in order to undo the safety. Now, if we were sitting in the open up, that could be plenty to put wings under that deer and “there he was…gone!â€. I’ve had deer spook with lesser motion. Nosotros learn past doing. My point being that, when the time came for me to interruption the shot, I slid my pollex to the tang-mounted prophylactic and “snicked†it off with no perceivable motion that could give me away. This is a very minor matter, simply those of you out in that location who’ve been in similar circumstances know what I’grand talking virtually.
BONUS Offering: Get your costless shooting range targets to print at home!
Get your costless targets to print at home!
Subscribe to our newsletter and become gun deals, educational content, hand's on reviews and news on constabulary changes!
Some other thing I like about my burglarize is the texturing on the forend and on the pistol grip. We chase in Nov and December, and blood brother, it can be cold here. Add together in a pair of insulated gloves and information technology doesn’t have much of a mis-move to drop your burglarize. The texturing allows me to get a firm grasp on the gun and to keep my easily there, fifty-fifty with beefy gloves on. I’ve experienced slick stocks on both long guns and handguns, and it’s non fun to take to try to catch the gun as information technology slips from your frozen fingers.
1 last plus is the accuracy. I know that burglarize accuracy can be an ephemeral, flighty thing that doesn’t always fall on the gun you lot have in your hands at the time. It just seems that the Centrality IIXP is built-in accurate, at least those that belong to some shooters I’ve talked with. Listen, mine is the bargain-basement model that sells for around $400 with a scope and is non the nearly-custom-shop level guns that Savage also makes. I was truly impressed with this rifle, especially when information technology shot a less-than-half minute of bending group at 100 yards. I said upwardly acme that I am a handgun guy, first and foremost, and for me to get a group like that, this gun must be something sort of special. One tin forgive a rifle nigh any fault, but if it ain’t accurate, nobody wants information technology.
OK. I said we were going to expect at the Cruel alongside the Mossberg, so let’s look at some specifications…
Vicious Axis II XP vs Mossberg Patriot Predator
| Savage Centrality 2 XP | Mossberg Patriot Predator | |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP: | $495 | $540 |
| Activity: | Commodities | Bolt |
| Barrel Color: | Black | Cerakote Patriot Brownish |
| Barrel End: | Matte | Matte |
| Barrel Length: | twenty in. | 22 in. |
| Butt Textile: | Carbon Steel | Carbon Steel |
| Caliber: | 243 Winchester | half dozen.5 Creedmoor |
| Magazine Capacity: | iv, detachable box | 5, detachable box |
| Length of Pull: | 12.75 in. | 13.75 in. |
| Overall Length: | 39.five in. | 42.25 in. |
| Charge per unit of Twist: | 1 in 9.25 in. | 1 in viii in. |
| Receiver Color: | Blackness | Cerakote Patriot Brown |
| Receiver Terminate: | Matte | Matte |
| Receiver Material: | Carbon Steel | Carbon Steel |
| Stock Color: | Black | Strata Camo |
| Stock Finish: | Matte | Matte |
| Stock Material: | Synthetic | Synthetic |
| Stock Type: | Sporter | Sporter |
| Weight: | 7.3 lbs. | 6.v lbs. |
The rifles are similar enough to each other, with a few exceptions. They both shot very well, with nearly the same felt recoil â€" that is, not a lot. The .243 delivers almost ix lbs. of recoil with the 6.5 dishing up just a tad more. At any charge per unit, these guns are non going to punish your shoulder. One chief difference betwixt the two is that the Mossberg has a threaded barrel and would accept a muzzle device of some sort â€" suppressor, cage brake â€" although I’m not certain why you’d put a muzzle brake on this barely-recoiling rifle. Suppressor, maybe just then you get into the subsonic argue.
The 6.5 Creedmoor was not meant to exist fired in subsonic form. The weight difference is not all that great â€" hard to tell by carrying ane after the other. The stock â€" ah, there’s the difference. Although both stocks are synthetic, the Mossberg’s camo stock seems more at home in the forest. Just, I’ve hunted more than 1 flavour with my Roughshod and the matte blackness stock disappears in a hunting blind. I’ll go along my matte black stock merely the manner it is, thank you. And, speaking of stocks, I can’t hit home enough well-nigh the texturing that Savage puts into their synthetic stocks (at least they did when they made this series of Centrality rifles).
Triggers
Let’s talk for but a infinitesimal on the two triggers these rifles employ. The Savage uses what they phone call the AccuTrigger. They have a short video nigh their trigger â€" yous can scout it here. Basically, it’s a pre-set, light trigger that is user-adjustable for pull length â€" if you want a longer pull or shorter, you can do that. The blade in the trigger is called the AccuRelease (marketing…). It catches the sear if the gun is jarred or dropped, preventing the rifle from firing inadvertently.
Well-nigh all I could observe out near the Mossberg LBA (Lightning Commodities Action) adjustable trigger is that it is user-adaptable from 2 â€" 7 pounds…
The thing virtually triggers on most any modern burglarize is that they are low-cal years alee of the stock trigger on an entry-level budget rifle of years ago. These triggers allow some really nice shooting to happen without the added expense of going to an aftermarket trigger or paying a gunsmith beaucoup bucks to work on information technology. Can y'all exercise meliorate? Of course. The top-line target rifles will have a more sensitive, adjustable trigger â€" in some cases, with a pull weight of downward to a few ounces. On a hunting gun, though, y'all don’t really want an ultralight trigger. It’due south too easy to snag the trigger guard on a branch, with an ensuing “kaboom†equally a result. For entry-level hunting guns, these triggers are fine. The Mossberg’due south trigger did feel a bit “mushier†than that in the Savage, although the final results experience fairly equal. That sub-MOA group I shot with the Savage is proof that the trigger works. (I did not get a chance to measure the rifles’ trigger pulls with my Lyman gauge but, balance assured, both triggers are very usable the way they sit).
Each of these rifles shot at to the lowest degree MOA groups, then I recollect the triggers pass muster. At present, let’s await at the stocks…
Both barrels are costless-floated to the receiver. Notice the bit of texturing on the Brutal â€" this does aid if your hands are moisture or cold.
Working our way rearward, here are the pistol grips. First, the Mossberg so the Cruel. Once again, there is more texturing on the Savage than on the Mossberg.
Now, the buttstocks. I didn’t take photos of the stocks because they are near identical. Each gun has a nice pad on the buttstock, with the Savage’s pad ventilated.
Every bit far every bit these stocks go, they are inexpensively made (relatively) and tend to be a scrap “whippy.†From a bench, the rifles are fine, but you might desire to be aware of the flex factor. If y'all lean against a tree as an impromptu residuum, effort to keep fifty-fifty pressure on the forend. Not a large deal, just something to keep in mind. I use shooting sticks in the blind, either a monopod or bipod. That keeps the pressure on the bottom of the stock, not on just one side. The Savage stock seemed to be made of a bit thicker blend of plastic â€" it didn’t experience quite as "flexible†equally the Mossberg stock, but that could take been me.
Bolts
The bolts are similar, with two locking lugs, a single claw extractor, and a spring-loaded ejector. There is non a whole lot of divergence betwixt these bolt faces than the commodities that was in my early-20th-century 8mm Mauser 24/47 surplus rifle. I guess the old proverb still applies â€" if information technology ain’t broke, don’t fix it. The fluting on the Mossberg’s bolt body adds to the pizzazz gene and helps the bolt ride smoothly in the channel. But… I’ve never had a problem with my Savage’s bolt binding. Both are slicker than grease on a glass doorknob.
I thing about the bolt lift â€" each one of these requires a bit of effort to lift the bolt handle. I merely figure that a slightly stiff bolt lift is endemic to the brood of lesser-expensive rifles. Again, no big bargain, as this will even out with more than shooting. A existent plus about the Roughshod commodities is that it is very hard to get the bolt to bind when pushing on the commodities handle. If you hit the handle a scrap off-center, the commodities usually still goes home, into the battery. I can’t say this for some other upkeep rifles’ bolts.
Here are the bolt releases. First, the Mossberg…
…and now the Savage:
Both guns use a simple “press-this-lever-down"-blazon switch, but at that place is one big difference: the Savage requires you lot to pull the trigger in club to release the bolt. Until I learned the drill, I thought I needed three hands to remove the bolt. Once I figured it out, it was easy but there was a tiny learning curve. With the Mossberg, no trigger pull is needed. Just lift the bolt handle, press the commodities release and pull the bolt out.
Magazines & Safeties
The magazines are a bit different, in terms of construction. The Mossberg is a polymer and holds 5 rounds, while the Fell magazine is steel and holds four. I’ve had several pistols that use poly magazines and they worked fine, so I don’t recollect that’s a big deal. But, the Mossberg magazine well is polymer as well. Once again, no big deal but information technology might matter to some. Every bit for the safeties, the Mossberg uses a slider on the opposite side of the stock as the bolt release. This is traditional, simply hard for lefties like me to operate. I like the Savage safety â€" it's a slider on the tang on the wrist of the stock. Correct on top where we lefties can get to it. Both safeties work fine but the Savage is more ergonomic, at least in my humble opinion.
I like the fact that Savage uses a metal magazine and mag well. Some other plus for me is the knob on the bolt handle â€" I similar round knobs. Call me former-fashioned, only I like it.
Range Fourth dimension
To put it in a nutshell â€" these guns tin can shoot. Collectively, more shots take gone down the Savage’s barrel than shots downward the Mossberg’due south. As I said above, the Mossberg had non been shot when Andy picked information technology up. He had not had an opportunity to shoot it until just recently, and so only for a few shots. He put a homemade box target up at his house, 100 yards out and went prone across his driveway…
He fired a few, then went to his knee for a few more shots. Information technology was near equally informal as information technology could take gotten, particularly since he had not adjusted the Nikon telescopic on his Mossberg. Afterward, when life slows down (does it ever?), he volition shoot from an “official†demote at a real target for groups. At any rate, he didn’t do bad considering the conditions…
With the society he shot them, these bullets are very shut to MOA accuracy. When he gets a hazard to shoot for existent, we’ll really see what the gun is capable of â€" he's a very skillful shot. The only ammo he’d been able to get was some S&B 108-grain FMJ ammo he’d picked up with the gun. I have a box of Fiocchi stuff I want him to shoot â€" that is very adept, consistent ammo. Nosotros volition exercise that the first chance nosotros have.
As for my Savage, I’d put probably the equivalent of 7-viii boxes of ammo through it, both factory and my handloads. It seems that my gun likes a 100-grain soft point over 42 grains of 4350 powder. It just kisses the 3,000 fps mark and is very accurate. Notwithstanding, this target was shot with Winchester 100-grain Super-X ammo, every bit the target shows. The 3-shot group is under a half inch at 100 yards…not too shabby, considering that I’m improve with handguns equally a rule. Information technology seems that the Savage Axis owners that I’ve been able to talk to have experienced sub-MOA groups with their stock, manufacturing plant rifles. That says a lot for the company.
I guess that if even both guns shot but MOA, they would still be putting bullets into a 4-inch circle at 400 yards. And then, these groups will practice for now but the fun comes in the experimentation equally nosotros all know. Plus, deer are unpredictable â€" the last one I shot with this rifle was at about 70 yards. That’s revolver territory! Anyhow, we will piece of work up loads using my chronograph and back m range. Over again, that’due south the fun function.
A versatile burglarize. Hither it is in .30-06 with a bipod â€" lethal on deer, or just about most anything that stalks the lower 48. Note the ventilated buttstock pad…it works.
Summing Up
I have tried, with this piddling exercise, to review the Savage Centrality IIXP by itself and in comparison with another budget rifle. I purposely did not get into great particular, with micrometer measurements, facts, figures, etc. considering I wanted this to be (as it’southward titled) a quick review for those maybe considering picking up a burglarize without spending a whole lot of money. Either of these guns would suffice for hunting deer-sized game at reasonable yardages or going into a coyote-rich environment and reducing their numbers a bit, but I really similar my Savage.
I liked the threaded barrel and easier commodities removal of the Mossberg. Simply I think the Savage has it over its competitor with its tang-mounted safety, “more-grippable†stock, slightly heavier weight (still under 8 pounds) and the non-binding bolt. And, allow us not forget the fact that it will shoot a iii-shot group at 100 yards tighter than ½ inch. This is a heck of a lot of gun for the money.
If you’ve had feel with the Savage Axis IIXP (or any Savage rifle, for that matter), experience gratuitous to chime in below. Every bit always, shoot whenever you can and be prophylactic!
Updated: July 2021
You might as well like to read:
- Mossberg 930 Tactical SPX â€" Robust, Reliable, & Congenital to Perform
- [Review] Mossberg MMR: Best Budget AR-15?
- Mossberg 464 SPX review â€" traditional meets tactical [2021]
Source: https://www.snipercountry.com/savage-axis-ii-xp-review/
0 Response to "Savage Axis 308 Review the Truth About Guns"
Post a Comment